Alcaraz

Alcaraz v. KMF Oakland LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20193:18-cv-02801-SICalifornia3,855 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BERNARDO ALCARAZ, Case No. 18-cv-02801-SI

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

9 v. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

10 KMF OAKLAND LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 28 11 Defendants.

12 13 On September 13, 2019, plaintiff Bernardo Alcaraz, who is representing himself pro se, filed 14 an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and order to show cause. Dkt. 15 No. 28 (“TRO App.”). At a case management conference held that same day, the Court ordered 16 plaintiff to serve and notify the opposing side and set a hearing for the TRO for October 11, 2019. 17 Dkt. No. 33. On September 16, 2019, defendant Altezza Condo LLC (“Altezza”) filed an 18 opposition. Dkt. Nos. 30 (“Def.’s Opp’n”), 31, 32. Alcaraz filed a reply brief and proposed order 19 on October 9, 2019. Dkt. Nos. 36, 37. 20 The Court held a hearing on October 11, 2019, at which Alcaraz and Altezza appeared. For 21 the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.