Azeveda

Azeveda v. Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20195:19-cv-01225California4,955 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

MARIO AZEVEDA,

8 Case No. 5:19-cv-01225-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. REMAND; GRANTING MOTION TO 10 COMPEL ARBITRATION

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

11 LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 20 12 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff moves for this case to be remanded claiming this Court lacks subject-matter 14 jurisdiction. Defendants separately move to compel arbitration and dismiss the putative class 15 action because Plaintiff agreed to arbitrate employment-related disputes with Defendants 16 individually. The Court finds this motion suitable for consideration without oral argument. See 17 N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the Parties’ papers, the Court DENIES the motion 18 to remand and GRANTS the motion to compel arbitration. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 A. Factual Background 21 On January 30, 2019, Mario…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.