X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 X ONE, INC., Case No.16-cv-06050-LHK

13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART

14 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

15 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 279, 282 16 Defendant. 17 18 On October 3, 2019, Plaintiff X One, Inc. filed an administrative motion to file under seal 19 Plaintiff’s Request for Reconsideration, Further Objections and Notice of Second Patent Claim 20 Reduction. ECF No. 279. On October 15, 2019, the Court denied the administrative motion to 21 file under seal. ECF No. 283. However, this denial was made in error, without considering the 22 declaration in support of sealing filed by Defendant Uber Technologies on October 7, 2019. ECF 23 No. 282. The Court now GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the administrative motion to file 24 under seal. 25 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records 26 and…