X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20195:16-cv-06050California1,356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

X ONE, INC., Case No.16-cv-06050-LHK

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 279, 282 Defendant. 17 On October 3, 2019, Plaintiff X One, Inc. filed an administrative motion to file under seal Plaintiff’s Request for Reconsideration, Further Objections and Notice of Second Patent Claim Reduction. ECF No. 279. On October 15, 2019, the Court denied the administrative motion to file under seal. ECF No. 283. However, this denial was made in error, without considering the declaration in support of sealing filed by Defendant Uber Technologies on October 7, 2019. ECF No. 282. The Court now GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the administrative motion to file under seal. “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.