Loftus

Loftus v. Sunrun Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20193:19-cv-01608California926 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIAM LOFTUS, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01608-RS (KAW)

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

9 v. LETTERS

10 SUNRUN INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 75, 76 11 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiffs filed the instant case against Defendants Sunrun Inc. and Media Mix 365, LLC 14 (“Media Mix”), alleging that Defendants had violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act 15 (“TCPA”) through its unsolicited telemarketing. (First Amended Compl. (“FAC”) ¶ 1.) Plaintiffs 16 also allege that Defendants violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) by recording 17 cellular communications without consent. (Id.) Defendant Media Mix is now in default. (Dkt. 18 No. 63.) 19 On September 10, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order 20 requiring Defendant Media Mix to provide discovery responses to Plaintiffs’ requests for 21 production (“RFPs”) and interrogatories. (Dkt. No. 64.) In support, Plaintiffs explained 22 Defendant Media Mix…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.