McAleenan

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 JANE DOE 1, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02349-BLF (VKD)

9 Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE AMENDED PROTECTIVE

10 v. ORDER

11 KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 250, 252 Defendants. 12

13 The parties have submitted for the Court’s consideration their respective proposed 14 protective orders that are based on the Court’s Model Protective Order for Litigation Involving 15 Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential Information and/or Trade Secrets. Dkt. Nos. 250, 252. 16 Although the parties agree with respect to several proposed revisions to the model order, they 17 disagree as to others. Where the parties have agreed on revisions to the model order, the Court 18 adopts those revisions. The Court resolves the parties’ disagreements as follows: 19 Section 3 (Scope). The model order states that its protections do not apply to “information 20 that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a receiving party.” This…