Sanger

Sanger v. Ahn

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20193:18-cv-07204California5,411 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PRIYA SANGER, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07204-JCS

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 AHE AHN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 53 Defendants. 11

12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiffs Priya Sanger and Michael Sanger are co-own a residential building in San 14 Francisco as a tenancy in common with non-party Leah Ahn and another individual who is not 15 involved with the facts of this case. The Sangers brought this action under California’s Uniform 16 Voidable Transactions Act (the “UVTA”) challenging a deed of trust recorded on March 18, 2013 17 by Defendant Lance Ahn (Leah Ahn’s brother) on behalf of Defendant Ahe Ahn (Leah Ahn and 18 Lance Ahn’s mother), which placed in trust Leah Ahn’s interest in the tenancy in common, 19 purportedly to secure Leah Ahn’s repayment of a promissory note in favor of Ahe Ahn. The 20 Ahns1 now move for summary judgment. The Court held a hearing on October 11, 2019. For the 21 reasons discussed below, the motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.