Shaw

Shaw v. Kelley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20195:16-cv-03768California7,620 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 CECIL EUGENE SHAW, Case No.16-cv-03768-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

10 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

11 RANDY KELLEY, et al., AND COSTS 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 109

13 14 I. BACKGROUND 15 Plaintiff Cecil Shaw filed this disability rights action, claiming that, during an August 21, 16 2014 visit, he was denied full and equal access at a Burger Pit restaurant (“Restaurant”) in San 17 Jose, California. He asserted claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 18 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), 19 Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53.1 20 The Court granted in part and denied in part Mr. Shaw’s motion for summary judgment. 21 That motion was granted with respect to several barriers in the parking lot, paths of travel, dining 22 area and restroom. Dkt. No. 79. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.