Chun

Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC v. Chun

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20195:18-cv-05476California2,393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING LLC, Case No. 5:18-cv-05476-BLF et al., 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES v. AND COSTS 11 ALAN A. CHUN, [Re: ECF 33] 12 Defendant. 13 This case arises from allegations of breach of a franchise agreement, trademark infringement, and unfair competition. See generally Compl. ¶¶ 1, 36–58, ECF 1. Alan A. Chun (“Defendant”) has failed to appear, and in July 2019 this Court granted in part and denied in part Baskin-Robbins and BP IP LLC’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Default Judgment. See Mot. for Default J., ECF 19; Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Pl.’s Mot. for Default J. (“Prior Order”) 2–3, 16, ECF 29; Order Entering Permanent Inj. Against Def. Alan Chun (“Order Entering Inj.”), ECF 30; Judgment, ECF 31. Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”). For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.