MLC Intellectual Property, LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MLC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-03657-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MLC'S ? v. "SUGGESTION REGARDING THE COURT'S RECUSAL" 10 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 702 11 Defendant. a 12 It has been brought to the Court’s attention that the document filed by plaintiff MLC at
13 || Docket No. 702 is a “Suggestion” regarding the Court’s recusal rather than a motion to disqualify,
v 14 || and thus that it is within the Court’s discretion to resolve the matter. See Civil L.R. 3-14. The Court
15 || has examined the record and concludes that there is no basis for recusal in this case. The Court G16 || recused itself from 19-3345 because the Court’s conflicts check revealed the presence of a conflict
= 17 with IMFT. Neither IMFT nor Intel is a party to this action.! See generally In re Specht, 622 F.3d
Zz 18 697 (7th Cir. 2010); United States v. Aragon, No. 99-50341, 2000 WL 868566, at *1 (9th Cir. June 19 |)…