Brignac

Brignac v. Yelp Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20193:19-cv-01188California4,815 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JARON LAMAR BRIGNAC, Case No. 19-cv-01188-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

YELP INC., Docket No. 64 Defendant.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Pro se Plaintiff Jaron Brignac brings this suit against Defendant Yelp, Inc. (“Yelp”) alleging that Yelp discriminated against him on the basis of race in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Pending before the Court is Yelp’s Motion to Dismiss Mr. Brignac’s Second Amended Complaint (“Mot.”), Docket No. 64, which the Court previously determined it would hear—in part—as a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Principally, the question currently before the Court is whether Mr. Brignac brings this suit on behalf of a corporation or whether he brings it on behalf of a sole proprietorship. If the former, the corporation must comply with Local Civil Rule 3-9(b), which requires that a corporation appearing before the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.