White
Expensify, Inc. v. White
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EXPENSIFY, INC., Case No. 19-cv-01892-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
EDDIE WHITE, Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendant.
Defendants Eddie White’s (“defendant White”) and Matt Koleslar’s (“defendant Koleslar”) (collectively, “defendants”) motion to dismiss plaintiff Expensify, Inc’s (“plaintiff”) complaint for declaratory relief came on for hearing before this court on September 18, 2019. Plaintiff appeared through its counsel, Steven Carlson and Kevin Pasquinelli. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Kevin Tucker. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss with prejudice for the following reasons. BACKGROUND On April 8, 2019, plaintiff filed this action for declaratory relief under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2201…