Knoles

Knoles v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20195:17-cv-06580California3,635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 MARLESSA KNOLES, Case No. 17-cv-06580-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING TEVA

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

v. THE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF

TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.; PERSONAL JURISDICTION;

TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICALS TERMINATING AS MOOT TEVA

PRODUCTS R&D, INC.; FEI WOMEN’S DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

HEALTH LLC; ORTHO-MCNEIL THE SECOND AMENDED

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; and COMPLAINT; AND DIRECTING

DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

THE SECOND AMENDED Defendants. COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS TO REMAINING

DEFENDANTS

14 [Re: ECF 72, 73] 15 16 Plaintiff Marlessa Knoles sues a number of entities for injuries she suffered due to implantation and removal of a Paragard Intrauterine Device (“IUD”). Defendants Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (“Teva…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.