Knoles
Knoles v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 6 MARLESSA KNOLES, Case No. 17-cv-06580-BLF
7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING TEVA
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
8 v. THE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF
9 TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.; PERSONAL JURISDICTION;
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICALS TERMINATING AS MOOT TEVA
10 PRODUCTS R&D, INC.; FEI WOMEN’S DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
HEALTH LLC; ORTHO-MCNEIL THE SECOND AMENDED
11 PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; and COMPLAINT; AND DIRECTING
DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
12 THE SECOND AMENDED Defendants. COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE 13 DISMISSED AS TO REMAINING
DEFENDANTS
14 [Re: ECF 72, 73] 15 16 17 Plaintiff Marlessa Knoles sues a number of entities for injuries she suffered due to 18 implantation and removal of a Paragard Intrauterine Device (“IUD”). Defendants Teva 19 Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (“Teva…