Soman

Soman v. Alameda Health System

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20193:17-cv-06076California219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAS SOMAN, Case No. 17-cv-06076-JD Plaintiff,

ORDER RE RECONSIDERATION AND

Vv. RE-OPENING CASE ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, ll Defendant.

In light of a Ninth Circuit opinion published after the Court dismissed this case, the Court 14 || advised the parties and the circuit that it would favorably view a motion for reconsideration by plaintiff. Dkt. No. 66. The circuit remanded the case on that basis, Dkt. No. 68, and the Court a 16 || now grants reconsideration. The FCRA practices found to be impermissible in Gilberg v. California Check Cashing Stores, LLC, 913 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 2019), are substantively identical 18 || to the ones Soman challenges here. Gilberg leaves no doubt that the second amended complaint 19 || states a plausible claim. The orders dismissing Soman’s second amended complaint and entering judgment against her, Dkt. Nos. 49 and 50, are vacated. Defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.