Soman
Soman v. Alameda Health System
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAS SOMAN, Case No. 17-cv-06076-JD 8 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE RECONSIDERATION AND
9 Vv. RE-OPENING CASE 10 ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, ll Defendant. 12
13 In light of a Ninth Circuit opinion published after the Court dismissed this case, the Court 14 || advised the parties and the circuit that it would favorably view a motion for reconsideration by 3 15 plaintiff. Dkt. No. 66. The circuit remanded the case on that basis, Dkt. No. 68, and the Court a 16 || now grants reconsideration. The FCRA practices found to be impermissible in Gilberg v. 3 17 California Check Cashing Stores, LLC, 913 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 2019), are substantively identical 18 || to the ones Soman challenges here. Gilberg leaves no doubt that the second amended complaint 19 || states a plausible claim. 20 The orders dismissing Soman’s second amended complaint and entering judgment against 21 her, Dkt. Nos. 49 and 50, are vacated. Defendant’s…