Frazier
Frazier v. American Credit Resolution, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JOSHUA M. FRAZIER, Case No. 18-cv-07729-TSH
7 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
8 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT
9 AMERICAN CREDIT RESOLUTION, Re: Dkt. No. 45
INC.,
10 Defendant. 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff Joshua M. Frazier brings this complaint against Defendant American Credit 14 Resolution (“ACR”) alleging that it violated both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 15 (“FDCPA”) and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”) through its 16 debt collection activities. After the parties initially reached a settlement, ACR stopped 17 participating, its counsel withdrew, and the Clerk entered its default. Frazier now moves for 18 default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). ECF No 45. No 19 opposition has been filed. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral 20 argument and VACATES the November 7, 2019 hearing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7- 21 (1)(b). After…