Mangiapane

Mangiapane v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20194:19-cv-02014California2,792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BETH MANGIAPANE, Case No. 19-cv-02014-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND

v. Re: Dkt. No. 11 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is a motion to remand filed by Plaintiff Beth Mangiapane. See Dkt. No. 11. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action in Santa Clara County Superior Court on March 12, 2019. See Dkt. No. 1-1, Ex. A (“Compl.”). Plaintiff alleges that on January 30, 2011, she purchased a vehicle manufactured by Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) from Defendant Tuttle-Click Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. (“Tuttle-Click”), a Ford dealership. Id. at ¶¶ 8–9. The vehicle was covered by an express 3-year/36,000-mile bumper-to-bumper warranty and a 5-year/60,000-mile 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.