Mangiapane
Mangiapane v. Ford Motor Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BETH MANGIAPANE, Case No. 19-cv-02014-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REMAND
9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 11 10 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants.
12 13 Pending before the Court is a motion to remand filed by Plaintiff Beth Mangiapane. See 14 Dkt. No. 11. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the 15 matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court 16 GRANTS the motion to remand. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiff filed this action in Santa Clara County Superior Court on March 12, 2019. See 19 Dkt. No. 1-1, Ex. A (“Compl.”). Plaintiff alleges that on January 30, 2011, she purchased a 20 vehicle manufactured by Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) from Defendant Tuttle-Click 21 Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. (“Tuttle-Click”), a Ford dealership. Id. at ¶¶ 8–9. The vehicle was 22 covered by an express 3-year/36,000-mile bumper-to-bumper warranty and a 5-year/60,000-mile 23…