Camilo

Camilo v. Ozuna

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20195:18-cv-02842California3,474 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RODRIGO CAMILO, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02842-VKD

9 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

10 v. RENEWED MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

11 SEVERO C. OZUNA, et al., SETTLEMENT 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 53

13 14 Plaintiffs Rodrigo Camilo, Alvaro Camilo, Ricardo Sanchez, and Jose Lopez filed this 15 hybrid class action and collective action for alleged wage and hour violations under various 16 provisions of the California Labor Code and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 17 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. Defendants are Severo C. Ozuna and the Don Vito Ozuna Food Corporation. 18 On plaintiffs’ initial unopposed motion for preliminary approval of settlement (Dkt. No. 19 40), the Court conditionally certified a Rule 23 class action and FLSA collective action, 20 designated the named plaintiffs as class representatives, appointed plaintiffs’ counsel as class 21 counsel, and reserved judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.