Saddozai

Saddozai v. Bolanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20195:18-cv-04047California837 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

SHIKEB SADDOZAI,

11 Case No. 18-04047 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. RECONSIDER APPOINTMENT OF 13 COUNSEL; GRANTING

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF

14 LOMU, et al., TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE

MOTION

15 Defendants. 16 (Docket Nos. 34, 36) 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 5, 2018, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to 20 amend. (Docket No. 11.) In the same order, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for 21 appointment of counsel. (Id.; Docket No. 4.) On July 11, 2019, the Court screened the 22 amended complaint and found it stated cognizable claims under the Eighth Amendment for 23 deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendants Lomu and Copeland, 24 officers at the Maguire Correctional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.