Hollis

Hollis v. Risenhoover

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20195:17-cv-00326California2,303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS,

Case No. 17-00326 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT;

DENYING MOTION FOR v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME NURSE REISENHOOVER, et al., TO FILE OPPOSITION; DENYING MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Defendants. (Docket Nos. 100, 107, 109, 110, 111) 18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical officials at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), where Plaintiff was formerly housed. Finding the complaint stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, the Court issued an order of service and directed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.