In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHELE JONES, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02518-JSW (KAW)

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING JOINT

9 v. DISCOVERY LETTER

10 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 103 11 Defendants.

12 Case No. 18-cv-3805-JSW (KAW)

IN RE DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS

13 MEMORY (DRAM) DIRECT ORDER REGARDING JOINT

PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION DISCOVERY LETTER

14 Re: Dkt. No. 52 15

16

17 The instant cases concern allegations that Defendants conspired to raise market prices for 18 Dynamic Random Access Memory (“DRAM”) products. DRAM is a semiconductor memory 19 device that is used in digital electronics, including mobile phones, personal computers, tablets, and 20 televisions. Plaintiffs represent two groups: direct purchasers (“DP”), who buy DRAM directly 21 from Defendants, and indirect purchasers (“IP”), who buy the products that DRAM has already 22 been incorporated into. The DP complaints have been consolidated into In re…