Demassa
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. Demassa
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE Case No. 18-cv-00043-MMC (TSH)
P.C.,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART RENEWED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS v. Re: Dkt. No. 118
CHRIS DEMASSA,
11 Defendant. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C., moves for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b) after Defendant Chris Demassa failed to comply with two orders compelling him to produce financial records to LegalForce’s outside counsel. ECF No. 118. Demassa filed an opposition. ECF No. 125. LegalForce did not file a reply. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the October 31, 2019 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS LegalForce’s motion for sanctions in part and …