Demassa

LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. Demassa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20193:18-cv-00043California4,335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE Case No. 18-cv-00043-MMC (TSH)

P.C.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART RENEWED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS v. Re: Dkt. No. 118

CHRIS DEMASSA,

11 Defendant. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C., moves for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b) after Defendant Chris Demassa failed to comply with two orders compelling him to produce financial records to LegalForce’s outside counsel. ECF No. 118. Demassa filed an opposition. ECF No. 125. LegalForce did not file a reply. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the October 31, 2019 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS LegalForce’s motion for sanctions in part and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.