Silverman
Silverman v. Lane
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 ; 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
JACOB SILVERMAN,
11 Case No. 18-04510 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, a 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Vv. COMPEL; DENYING MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS; GRANTING MOTION
TO WITHDRAW PREVIOUS
DORSEY LANE, et al., MOTION; DENYING MOTION TO
AMEND; GRANTING MOTION FOR
8 15 Defendants. RETURN OF EXHIBITS 16 (Docket. Nos. 55, 57, 58, 63, 64)
17
18 Plaintiff, a California state pretrial detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint 19 | under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison officials at the Humboldt County Correctional 20 | RB acility “HCCF”). The Court found the complaint, (Docket No. 1), stated cognizable 21 || claims for excessive force and failure to protect prisoner’s safety, and ordered the matter 22 |! served on Defendants. (Docket No. 13.) Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the claims 23 against them for failure to plead…