Silverman

Silverman v. Lane

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20195:18-cv-04510California1,639 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 ; 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

JACOB SILVERMAN,

11 Case No. 18-04510 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, a 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Vv. COMPEL; DENYING MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS; GRANTING MOTION

TO WITHDRAW PREVIOUS

DORSEY LANE, et al., MOTION; DENYING MOTION TO

AMEND; GRANTING MOTION FOR

8 15 Defendants. RETURN OF EXHIBITS 16 (Docket. Nos. 55, 57, 58, 63, 64)

17

18 Plaintiff, a California state pretrial detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint 19 | under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison officials at the Humboldt County Correctional 20 | RB acility “HCCF”). The Court found the complaint, (Docket No. 1), stated cognizable 21 || claims for excessive force and failure to protect prisoner’s safety, and ordered the matter 22 |! served on Defendants. (Docket No. 13.) Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the claims 23 against them for failure to plead…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.