In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHELE JONES, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02518-JSW (KAW)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER REGARDING JOINT
v. DISCOVERY LETTER
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 103 Defendants.
Case No. 18-cv-3805-JSW (KAW)
IN RE DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS
MEMORY (DRAM) DIRECT ORDER REGARDING JOINT
PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION DISCOVERY LETTER
14 Re: Dkt. No. 52
The instant cases concern allegations that Defendants conspired to raise market prices for Dynamic Random Access Memory (“DRAM”) products. DRAM is a semiconductor memory device that is used in digital electronics, including mobile phones, personal computers, tablets, and televisions. Plaintiffs represent two groups: direct purchasers (“DP”), who buy DRAM directly from Defendants, and indirect purchasers (“IP”), who buy the products that DRAM has already been incorporated into. The DP complaints have been consolidated into In re…