Saddozai

Saddozai v. Bolanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20195:18-cv-03972California364 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

SHIKEB SADDOZAI,

11 Case No. 18-03972 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER DENYING SECOND v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF 13 COUNSEL 14 CARLOS BOLANOS, et al., 15 Defendants. (Docket No. 24) 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 5, 2018, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to 20 amend. (Docket No. 10.) In the same order, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for 21 appointment of counsel. (Id.; Docket No. 3.) Plaintiff has filed a second motion for 22 appointment of counsel for essentially the same reasons stated in his first motion, i.e., he is 23 unable to afford counsel, the issues are complex, limited access to the law library, limited 24 knowledge of the law, and counsel’s assistance would be invaluable should the matter go 25 to trial. (Docket No. 24.) 26 The Court dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.