Saddozai

Saddozai v. Bolanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20195:18-cv-03972California364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHIKEB SADDOZAI,

Case No. 18-03972 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING SECOND v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL CARLOS BOLANOS, et al., Defendants. (Docket No. 24) 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 5, 2018, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. (Docket No. 10.) In the same order, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. (Id.; Docket No. 3.) Plaintiff has filed a second motion for appointment of counsel for essentially the same reasons stated in his first motion, i.e., he is unable to afford counsel, the issues are complex, limited access to the law library, limited knowledge of the law, and counsel’s assistance would be invaluable should the matter go to trial. (Docket No. 24.) The Court dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.