Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DIVA LIMOUSINE, LTD., Case No. 18-cv-05546-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

9 v. NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Docket No. 139 11 Defendants.

12 13 On October 7, 2019, Plaintiff Diva Limousine, Ltd. filed a Notice of Voluntarily Dismissal 14 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Docket No. 139. 15 That Notice included dismissal of all individual claims with prejudice and dismissal of all class 16 claims without prejudice, with each side to bear its own fees and costs. Id. That same day, the 17 Court issued an Order Requesting Information from the Parties. See Docket No. 140. 18 Specifically, the Court requested that the parties provide information “about the scope and nature 19 of the publicity associated with this putative class action,” so that the Court might appropriately 20 safeguard the interests of absent plaintiffs. Id. 21 Shortly thereafter, counsel for Defendants lodged…