Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20193:18-cv-05546California884 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DIVA LIMOUSINE, LTD., Case No. 18-cv-05546-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Docket No. 139 Defendants.

12 On October 7, 2019, Plaintiff Diva Limousine, Ltd. filed a Notice of Voluntarily Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Docket No. 139. That Notice included dismissal of all individual claims with prejudice and dismissal of all class claims without prejudice, with each side to bear its own fees and costs. Id. That same day, the Court issued an Order Requesting Information from the Parties. See Docket No. 140. Specifically, the Court requested that the parties provide information “about the scope and nature of the publicity associated with this putative class action,” so that the Court might appropriately safeguard the interests of absent plaintiffs. Id. Shortly thereafter, counsel for Defendants lodged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.