Wade

Wade v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20195:18-cv-06303California4,386 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

8 Case No. 5:15-cr-00458-EJD-1 Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 28 v. U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION TO VACATE, 10 REMAND, OR SET ASIDE

BOBBY WADE,

11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 151, 152, 154, 161 Defendant. 12

13 Before the Court is Defendant Bobby Wade’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to set aside, vacate, 14 or remand his sentence. Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 Motion (“Mot.”), Dkt. 152. On January 8, 15 2019, the Government filed an answer replying to Defendant’s motion. United States’ Response 16 to Defendant’s Motion (“Answer”), Dkt. 155. Defendant submitted a reply to this answer. 17 Petitioner’s Response to the Government’s Response (“Reply”), Dkt. 159. He also submitted a 18 supplement to his original Section 2255 motion, arguing the supplemental “relates back” pursuant 19 to Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(c)(2)(B).1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.