Walker

Walker v. Chisman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20193:19-cv-03678California1,550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEEWIN L. WALKER, Case No. 19-cv-03678-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v. Docket No. 1 MIKE CHISMAN, Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Keewin L. Walker, a prisoner at the Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint is now before the court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. II. BACKGROUND Mr. Walker alleges the following in his complaint: Mr. M. Chisman, the healthcare facility maintenance custodian at Pelican Bay State Prison, “made a racial statement and when confronted about it, he began to be verbally abusive.” Docket No. 1 at 3. Mr. Chisman eventually falsified a CDCR-128 informational chrono to discredit Mr. Walker and changed Mr. Walker’s work schedule in a way that affected Mr. Walker’s pay as “retaliation for [Mr. Walker] confronting him about his racist statement.” Id. On June 26, 2018, Mr. Chisman “tried…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.