Frederick Michele Brady v. Patenaude & Felix, A Professional Corporation

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20195:18-cv-07305California1,438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK MICHELE BRADY, Case No. 18-cv-07305-NC Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

PATENAUDE & FELIX and MICHAEL

R. BOULANGER, Re: Dkt. No.

14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Frederick Michele Brady prevailed in this Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case and is entitled to attorneys’ fees under 15 U.S.C. § 1692. Brady accepted defendants’ $2,001.00 offer of judgment under Rule 68 but the parties have since failed to reach an agreement as to a reasonable amount of attorney’s fees. Dkt. Nos. 25, 26, 28. Plaintiffs request a total of $20,330.05 in costs and fees, including time spent on briefing this issue, and defendants argue that $6,202.50 is the reasonable amount. Dkt. Nos. 28, 30, 31. The Court FINDS that plaintiff’s counsels’ total time spent on this case was reasonable but that the hourly rate requested for Brady’s attorneys is not reasonable relative to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.