Hubbard

Hubbard v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20194:19-cv-04136California2,673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZANE HUBBARD, Case No. 19-cv-04136-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. His complaint (ECF No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity, or from an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.