Kannan

Kannan v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20195:17-cv-07305California2,218 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RAJA KANNAN, Case No. 17-cv-07305-EJD (VKD)

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

10 v. PLAINTIFF’S PRIVILEGE LOG

11 APPLE INC., Re: Dkt. No. 152 Defendant. 12

13 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute regarding the adequacy of plaintiff Raja 14 Kannan’s privilege log. Dkt. No. 152. The Court directed Mr. Kannan to submit the documents 15 corresponding to entries #1-20 for in camera review. Dkt. No. 154. Mr. Kannan instead 16 submitted the documents corresponding to entries #1-2, 4-15, 17-23, and 25.1 17 For the following reasons, the Court concludes that Mr. Kannan has substantiated his 18 claims of attorney-client privilege or work product protection as to the documents submitted for in 19 camera review corresponding to entries #1-2, 4-15, 17-20, and his claim of spousal privilege in 20 entries #21-23 and 25 in his October 16, 2019 privilege log. Mr. Kannan has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.