Perez

Perez v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20193:19-cv-02926California855 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 SILVIA A. BRANDON PEREZ, Case No. 19-cv-02926-JD

7 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE IFP APPLICATION,

8 v. COMPLAINT AND INJUNCTION

REQUEST

9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 7 Defendants. 10

11 Pro se plaintiff Siliva Brandon Perez filed a first amended complaint alleging federal and 12 state law claims for government corruption, racism, hate crimes, incitement to violence, and 13 emotional distress. Dkt. No. 4. The claims are brought against an array of California state and 14 Alameda County entities, and several neighbors. Perez submitted an application to proceed in 15 forma pauperis (“IFP”) in conjunction with her lawsuit. Dkt. No. 2. She also recently filed an ex 16 parte “emergency injunction” that largely repeats, in summary form, the allegations in the 17 amended complaint. Dkt. No. 7. 18 The IFP application is denied and the complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. In 19 determining whether IFP status should be granted, the Court may dismiss a complaint that fails to 20 state a claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.