Johnson v. Maple Tree Investors

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 17-CV-06762-LHK

13 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR 14 v.

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

15 MAPLE TREE INVESTORS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 41 16 Defendants. 17 18 On October 8, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for administrative relief, requesting that the 19 Court order Plaintiff to provide an unredacted line-item fee invoice in compliance with General 20 Order 56. ECF No. 41 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff filed an opposition. ECF No. 44 (“Opp’n”).1 21 Defendants filed a court-ordered reply, requesting in the alternative that the Court order Plaintiff 22 to provide a full and unredacted version to the Mediator and a redacted version to Defendants. 23 ECF No. 46 (“Reply”). The Court GRANTS in part Defendants’ request, as explained below. 24 General Order 56 provides that, “[i]f the parties reach a tentative agreement on injunctive 25 relief, plaintiff shall forthwith provide defendant with a statement of costs and…