Johnson v. Maple Tree Investors

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20195:17-cv-06762California1,557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 17-CV-06762-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR v.

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

MAPLE TREE INVESTORS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 41 Defendants. 17 On October 8, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for administrative relief, requesting that the Court order Plaintiff to provide an unredacted line-item fee invoice in compliance with General Order 56. ECF No. 41 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff filed an opposition. ECF No. 44 (“Opp’n”).1 Defendants filed a court-ordered reply, requesting in the alternative that the Court order Plaintiff to provide a full and unredacted version to the Mediator and a redacted version to Defendants. ECF No. 46 (“Reply”). The Court GRANTS in part Defendants’ request, as explained below. General Order 56 provides that, “[i]f the parties reach a tentative agreement on injunctive relief, plaintiff shall forthwith provide defendant with a statement of costs and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.