Gamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20193:18-cv-01942California1,778 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GAMEVICE, INC., Case No. 18-cv-01942-RS (TSH)

8 Plaintiff,

DISCOVERY ORDER

9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 102, 104 10 NINTENDO CO., LTD., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 Nintendo moves to compel further responses to its interrogatory No. 6 and request for 14 production (“RFP”) No. 17,1 and Gamevice opposes. ECF Nos. 102, 104. 15 Nintendo served interrogatory No. 6 on July 12, 2018. It asked Gamevice to:

16 Identify all sales, revenue, and profit information for each model of Gamevice Accessory identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1, for 17 the period from January 1, 2013 to the present day, including by identifying on monthly, quarterly, and yearly basis: the number of 18 units sold; the gross selling price; the net selling price; any sales allowances, sales discounts, and sales returns deducted from gross 19 selling price; costs of goods sold; gross profit; gross margin; indirect or fixed expense(s); net profit; and net margin. 20 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.