Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20194:19-cv-04133California413 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 EPIC GAMES, INC., CASE NO. 4:19-cv-04133-YGR

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

10 vs. Re: Dkt. No. 22, 26 11 ACCELERATION BAY LLC, 12 Defendant.

13 14 On October 22, 2019, the Court heard oral argument on defendant’s motion dismiss. (Dkt. 15 No. 22.) As stated on the record, and confirmed herein, having carefully considered the briefing 16 and arguments submitted in this matter, the Court DENIES defendant’s motion. Subject matter 17 jurisdiction is proper under MedImmune, Inc. v. Genetch, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 126-37 (2007) and 18 Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Acceleron LLC, 587 F.3d 1358, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2009). 19 Plaintiff also submitted a motion to seal certain exhibits and portions of its opposition brief 20 on the grounds that the information was provided under the protective order. (Dkt. No. 26.) 21 Defendant, in response, seeks affirmatively to have the material sealed on the grounds that the 22 information contains “confidential licensing information.” (Dkt. No. 27.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.