Hernandez

Hernandez v. Puga

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20195:19-cv-04143California174 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GERARDO HERNANDEZ, Case No.19-cv-04143-NC

Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL

DISMISSAL

13 Re: Dkt, No. 12 14 SALVADOR PUGA, et al., Defendants. 15

a 16 5 17 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

18 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 20 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 21 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are 22 || VACATED. 23 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 45 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 || Dated: October 31, 2019 hGe<——— —_—>

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

28 United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.