Thomas

Thomas v. Shaw

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20193:18-cv-06409California614 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 JOSEPH THOMAS, Case No. 18-cv-06409-LB

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

13 v. CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT JEFFREY

SCARCELLO SHOULD NOT BE

14 RANDALL SHAW, et al., DISMISSED 15 Defendants. Re: ECF No. 1 16 17 Plaintiff Joseph Thomas brings this suit against defendants Randall Shaw, Mwangi Mukami, 18 Jeffrey Scarcello, and Tenderloin Housing Clinic Inc.1 19 Mr. Thomas brings only one claim against Mr. Scarcello: a putative claim for violation of “the 20 Civil Rights Act of 1968[,] 18 USC §5245(b)(2), the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement 21 Act[,] 28 USC §994 note sec. 280003.”2 Mr. Thomas alleges that Mr. Scarcello used “fighting 22 words” and various epithets against him and got into an altercation with him.3 (Mr. Scarcello, for 23 24 1 [Second] Amend. Compl. (“SAC”) – ECF No. 46. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case 25 File (“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.