Golden Eye 2000, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20194:19-cv-03402-HSGCalifornia1,556 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN THE MATTER OF GOLDEN EYE Case No. 19-cv-03402-HSG 2000, LLC 8 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF-IN-

LIMITATION’S MOTION FOR

9 DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND

PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION TO

10 REMAND AND STAY CASE 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 20

12 13 Plaintiff-in-Limitation Golden Eye 2000, LLC (“Golden Eye”) initiated this admiralty 14 action under the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30511, and Supplemental Admiralty and 15 Maritime Claims Rule F (“Rule F”). Currently before the Court is Golden Eye’s motion for 16 default judgment against all non-appearing claimants. Dkt. No. 19. The parties also filed a joint 17 stipulation requesting that the Court remand and stay this case pending resolution of the state court 18 action. Dkt. No. 20. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 The Limitation of Liability Act “allows a vessel owner to limit liability for damage or 21 injury, occasioned without the owner’s privity or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.