Golden Eye 2000, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20194:19-cv-03402-HSGCalifornia1,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN THE MATTER OF GOLDEN EYE Case No. 19-cv-03402-HSG 2000, LLC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF-IN-

LIMITATION’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND

PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION TO

REMAND AND STAY CASE Re: Dkt. Nos. 19,

12 Plaintiff-in-Limitation Golden Eye 2000, LLC (“Golden Eye”) initiated this admiralty action under the Limitation of Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30511, and Supplemental Admiralty and Maritime Claims Rule F (“Rule F”). Currently before the Court is Golden Eye’s motion for default judgment against all non-appearing claimants. Dkt. No. 19. The parties also filed a joint stipulation requesting that the Court remand and stay this case pending resolution of the state court action. Dkt. No. 20. I. BACKGROUND The Limitation of Liability Act “allows a vessel owner to limit liability for damage or injury, occasioned without the owner’s privity or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.