Huang

WeRide Corp. v. Huang

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20195:18-cv-07233California7,142 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 WERIDE CORP., et al., 5 Case No. 5:18-cv-07233-EJD Plaintiffs, 6 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 7 MODIFY THE PRELIMINARY KUN HUANG, et al., INJUNCTION 8 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 166 9

10 In March of this year, the court granted the motion for preliminary injunction (“the PI 11 Order”) brought by Plaintiffs WeRide Corp. and WeRide, Inc. (collectively “WeRide”). Dkt. No. 12 116 (the “PI Order”). The Preliminary Injunction binds Defendants Zhong Zhi Xing Technology 13 Co. Ltd. (“ZZX”), AllRide.AI, Inc. (“AllRide.AI,” collectively with ZZX, as “the AllRide 14 Defendants”), and Kun Huang. Id. at 24-28. The court denied the motion as to Defendant Jing 15 Wang, finding—as relevant here—that WeRide had not shown that it was likely to succeed on the 16 merits of its trade secret misappropriation claim against him. Id. at 16. Since…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.