Teradata Corporation v. SAP SE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TERADATA CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 18-cv-03670-WHO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR RELIEF

SAP SE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 146, 184, 185, 186 Defendants.

Currently before me is plaintiff Teradata Corporation’s motion for relief from Magistrate Judge Laporte’s non-dispositive September 9, 2019 “Order Regarding the Parties’ Cross-Motions Related to Certain Audit-Related Documents.” Dkt. No. 173. For the reasons discussed below, I overrule the objection and affirm Judge Laporte’s determination that SAP did not affect an at issue waiver as to the audit-report or findings. I also conclude that, absent more explanation or caselaw support, Teradata is not required to identify every single individual who received or had access to the privileged information.1 In her September 9, 2019 Order, Judge Laporte considered whether various materials in Teradata’s possession were SAP’s privileged documents (“audit-related…