Silverman

Silverman v. Ivers

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20195:17-cv-03700California6,229 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

JACOB S. SILVERMAN,

11 Case No. 17-03700 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

AMEND CLAIMS AND

v. 13 DEFENDANTS; DENYING

MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIDAVIT;

14 IVERS, et al., GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

15 Defendants. OPPOSITION; DIRECTING

DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY

16 (Docket Nos. 84, 87, 90, 91, 97) 17 18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against staff at the Humboldt County Correctional Facility (“HCCF”). 20 The Court found the second amended complaint, (Docket No. 12, hereinafter “SAC”), 21 stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical 22 needs, and ordered the matter served on Defendants. (Docket No. 18.) Defendants Dean 23 Flint and Duane Christian filed a motion to dismiss the claims against them for failure to 24 plead sufficient facts to establish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.