Datt

Datt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20195:19-cv-01216California2,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KANTA DATT, et al., Case No. 5:19-cv-01216-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 8, 21

Plaintiffs Kanta and Ram Datt allege that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank fraudulently, negligently, and willfully caused Plaintiffs to pay excessive mortgage and interest payments. See Complaint (“Compl.”), Dkt. 1. Plaintiffs, however, have already litigated most of the claims arising from the alleged overcharging in state court and are thus foreclosed from relitigating them again. The claim not previously litigated is time-barred. The Court finds this motion suitable for consideration without oral argument. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the Parties’ papers, Defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.