Datt
Datt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KANTA DATT, et al., Case No. 5:19-cv-01216-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT
11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 8, 21
Plaintiffs Kanta and Ram Datt allege that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank fraudulently, negligently, and willfully caused Plaintiffs to pay excessive mortgage and interest payments. See Complaint (“Compl.”), Dkt. 1. Plaintiffs, however, have already litigated most of the claims arising from the alleged overcharging in state court and are thus foreclosed from relitigating them again. The claim not previously litigated is time-barred. The Court finds this motion suitable for consideration without oral argument. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the Parties’ papers, Defendant’s…