Proofpoint, Inc. v. Vade Secure, Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20193:19-cv-04238California651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04238-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS

v. PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT;

VACATING HEARING

VADE SECURE, INCORPORATED, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 12 Defendants.

13 Before the Court is defendants Vade Secure, Inc., Vade Secure SASU (collectively, "Vade"), and Olivier Lemarié's ("Lemarié") Motion, filed September 16, 2019, "to Partially Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint." Plaintiffs Proofpoint, Inc. ("Proofpoint") and Cloudmark, LLC ("Cloudmark") have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision on the parties' respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for November 8, 2019, and rules as follows. By the instant motion, defendants seek dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.