Proofpoint, Inc. v. Vade Secure, Incorporated

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 PROOFPOINT, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04238-MMC

9 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS

10 v. PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT;

VACATING HEARING

11 VADE SECURE, INCORPORATED, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 12 Defendants.

13 14 Before the Court is defendants Vade Secure, Inc., Vade Secure SASU 15 (collectively, "Vade"), and Olivier Lemarié's ("Lemarié") Motion, filed September 16, 2019, 16 "to Partially Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint." Plaintiffs Proofpoint, Inc. ("Proofpoint") and 17 Cloudmark, LLC ("Cloudmark") have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. 18 Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, 19 the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision on the parties' respective written 20 submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for November 8, 2019, and rules as 21 follows. 22 By the instant motion, defendants seek dismissal…