Thomas
Thomas v. Shaw
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 JOSEPH THOMAS, Case No. 18-cv-06409-LB
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S
13 v. CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT
JEFFREY SCARCELLO
14 RANDALL SHAW, et al., Re: ECF No. 116, 117 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Joseph Thomas brings this suit against defendants Randall Shaw, Mwangi Mukami, 19 Jeffrey Scarcello, and Tenderloin Housing Clinic Inc.1 Mr. Thomas brings only one claim against 20 Mr. Scarcello: a putative claim for violation of “the Civil Rights Act of 1968[,] 18 USC 21 §5245(b)(2), the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act[,] 28 USC §994 note sec. 22 280003.”2 Mr. Thomas alleges that Mr. Scarcello used “fighting words” and various epithets 23 24
25 1 [Second] Amend. Compl. (“SAC”) – ECF No. 46. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case 26 File (“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of documents. Mr.…