Baptiste

Baptiste v. Hatton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20194:19-cv-06551California3,202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KENNETH E. BAPTISTE, Case No. 19-cv-06551-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND, DENYING EX PARTE

v. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

J. HATTON, et al., PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION,

DENYING MOTION FOR

Defendants. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Re: Dkt. Nos. 3,

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, an inmate at California Training Facility – Central (“CTF”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity, or from an officer or an employee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.