Baptiste

Baptiste v. Hatton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20194:19-cv-06551California3,202 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KENNETH E. BAPTISTE, Case No. 19-cv-06551-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND, DENYING EX PARTE

9 v. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

10 J. HATTON, et al., PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION,

DENYING MOTION FOR

11 Defendants. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 4

13

14 INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff, an inmate at California Training Facility – Central (“CTF”), filed this pro se civil 16 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma 17 pauperis in a separate order. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 18 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 19 DISCUSSION 20 A. Standard of Review 21 A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner 22 seeks redress from a governmental entity, or from an officer or an employee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.