Baptiste
Baptiste v. Hatton
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KENNETH E. BAPTISTE, Case No. 19-cv-06551-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE
TO AMEND, DENYING EX PARTE
9 v. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND
10 J. HATTON, et al., PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION,
DENYING MOTION FOR
11 Defendants. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 4
13
14 INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff, an inmate at California Training Facility – Central (“CTF”), filed this pro se civil 16 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma 17 pauperis in a separate order. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 18 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 19 DISCUSSION 20 A. Standard of Review 21 A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner 22 seeks redress from a governmental entity, or from an officer or an employee…