Miroyan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL MIROYAN, Case No. 3:19-cv-03626-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 27 TAE KAI, et al., Defendants.

12 On September 11, 2019, I dismissed pro se plaintiff Michael Miroyan’s complaint for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 22. Miroyan pleaded federal claims against Judge Robert D.S. Kim of the Third Circuit in Hawaii, but there was no evidence in the docket that Judge Kim had been served, Miroyan had alleged no facts to support the claims, and the claims seemed to be barred. The remaining claims were based in state law, and in the clear absence of diversity jurisdiction,2 I lacked jurisdiction over them. In that Order, I gave Miroyan until October 2, 2019 to file a first amended complaint. On October 1, Miroyan requested additional time to amend; I granted his request in part and gave him until October 16 to file an amended complaint.3 See Dkt. Nos. 23, 24. On October 15, 2019, Miroyan filed several documents. …