McCurdy

McCurdy v. Deal

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20195:17-cv-01043California1,787 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

JAMES MCCURDY,

11 Case No. 17-01043 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 3 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT; 13 DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE

APPEAL AS UNNECESSARY

L 14 M. RIVERO, et al.,

15 Defendants. a 16 (Docket Nos. 147, 151)

17

Z 18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 || 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at various institutions, including Defendant Dr. 20 || B. Deal at San Quentin State Prison (““SQSP”). On September 10, 2019, the Court granted 21 || Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment 22 || deliberate indifference claim; judgment was entered the following day. (Docket Nos. 145, 23 || 146.) Plaintiff has filed a motion to alter or amend judgment, which the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.

McCurdy · N.D. California · 2019 | Caselegis