Dolby Laboratories, Inc. v. Intertrust Technologies Corporation

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC., Case No. 19-cv-03371-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

REDACTED/PUBLIC VERSION

9 v.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

10 INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES MOTION TO DISMISS

CORPORATION,

11 Docket Nos. 40-4, 41 Defendant.

12 13 14 Plaintiff Dolby Laboratories, Inc. has filed suit against Defendant Intertrust Technologies 15 Corporation, seeking a declaration that Dolby does not infringe eleven patents held by Intertrust. 16 Currently pending before the Court is Intertrust’s motion to dismiss. In the motion, Intertrust 17 makes two arguments: (1) subject matter jurisdiction is lacking because there is no case or 18 controversy between the parties once information protected by a Nondisclosure Agreement 19 (“NDA”) is “excised” from the operative complaint and (2) even if there were subject matter 20 jurisdiction, Dolby has failed to state a claim for relief – once again, when information protected 21 by the NDA is excised. 22 Having…