Gordon
Gordon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 9
ROBERT GORDON,
10 Case No. 5:10-cv-05399-EJD Plaintiff, 11 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT UNDER 12 FRCP 52; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
13 COMPANY, UNDER FRCP 52 14 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 86
15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 In this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. 18 §1001, et seq. (“ERISA”), Plaintiff Robert Gordon (“Plaintiff”) seeks long term disability benefits 19 from Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Defendant”). Plaintiff contends that the 20 medical records show that he was forced to leave his employment with Borland Software 21 “Borland” due to severe depression, anxiety, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder 22 caused by harassment and threats from…