Hyams

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 RYAN HYAMS, Case No. 18-cv-06271-PJH (LB)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER ADDRESSING DISCOVERY

13 v. LETTER BRIEFS

14 CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 105–109 15 Defendants. 16 17 The court’s standing order provides that (absent a superseding order to the contrary) the parties 18 must meet and confer regarding discovery disputes (in person if counsel are local or by telephone 19 if they are not) and then must raise discovery disputes in a joint letter brief that includes (1) a 20 statement of the unresolved issue, (2) a summary of each party’s position (with citations to 21 supporting facts and legal authority), and (3) each party’s final proposed compromise.1 Plaintiff 22 Ryan Hyams filed four individual discovery letter briefs.2 Mr. Hyams says that he sent his 23 positions to the defendants (collectively, “CVS”) on October 30, 2019, and asked for their 24 25

26 1 Standing Order – ECF No. 34-1 at 2–3.…