Hyams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division RYAN HYAMS, Case No. 18-cv-06271-PJH (LB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADDRESSING DISCOVERY

v. LETTER BRIEFS

CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 105–109 Defendants. 16 The court’s standing order provides that (absent a superseding order to the contrary) the parties must meet and confer regarding discovery disputes (in person if counsel are local or by telephone if they are not) and then must raise discovery disputes in a joint letter brief that includes (1) a statement of the unresolved issue, (2) a summary of each party’s position (with citations to supporting facts and legal authority), and (3) each party’s final proposed compromise.1 Plaintiff Ryan Hyams filed four individual discovery letter briefs.2 Mr. Hyams says that he sent his positions to the defendants (collectively, “CVS”) on October 30, 2019, and asked for their 24

26 1 Standing Order – ECF No. 34-1 at 2–3.…