Woods

Woods v. City of Hayward

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20193:19-cv-01350California5,109 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BOBBIE ALLEN WOODS, Case No. 19-cv-01350-JCS

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

9 v. DISMISS

10 CITY OF HAYWARD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendants. 11

12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff Bobbie Allen Woods, pro se, brought this action against Defendants the City of 14 Hayward, the Hayward Police Department, Hayward Police Officer B. Tong, and Hayward Police 15 Sergeant Polar1 asserting claims based on a police search of Woods’s home. Defendants move to 16 dismiss. The Court found the motion suitable for resolution without oral argument and vacated 17 the noticed hearing date. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is DENIED as to Woods’s 18 claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) against the City of Hayward and the 19 Hayward Police Department, GRANTED with prejudice as to Woods’s ADA claims against Tong 20 and Polar, and GRANTED with leave to amend as to all other claims. If Woods wishes to pursue 21 the claims dismissed with leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.