Vandercourt-v-Nancy A. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 O. DENISE VANDERCOURT, Case No. 18-cv-02976-MMC
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
9 v. DENYING DEFENDANT'S CROSS-
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 16 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is plaintiff O. Denise Vandercourt’s (“Vandercourt”)2 motion for 14 summary judgment, filed November 15, 2018, by which Vandercourt seeks review of a 15 decision issued January 12, 2017, by an administrative law judge (“ALJ”), denying her 16 claim for Social Security disability insurance benefits. Also before the Court is the cross- 17 motion for summary judgment, filed January 8, 2019, by defendant, the Commissioner of 18 Social Security (“Commissioner”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have 19 been submitted on the papers without oral argument. Having read and considered the 20 parties’ respective written submissions, the Court rules as…