Vandercourt-v-Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20193:18-cv-02976California7,504 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 O. DENISE VANDERCOURT, Case No. 18-cv-02976-MMC

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

9 v. DENYING DEFENDANT'S CROSS-

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 16 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is plaintiff O. Denise Vandercourt’s (“Vandercourt”)2 motion for 14 summary judgment, filed November 15, 2018, by which Vandercourt seeks review of a 15 decision issued January 12, 2017, by an administrative law judge (“ALJ”), denying her 16 claim for Social Security disability insurance benefits. Also before the Court is the cross- 17 motion for summary judgment, filed January 8, 2019, by defendant, the Commissioner of 18 Social Security (“Commissioner”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have 19 been submitted on the papers without oral argument. Having read and considered the 20 parties’ respective written submissions, the Court rules as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.